Browse › Number theory › 003 The quasi-Riemann hypothesis
Uniform exclusion of Landau–Siegel zeros
Community-revisedNotes Lean
Revised with community contributions. Original OpenAI version (October 1, 2026) · Change history
Open PDFCite Report a problem Add a reference or comment Interested in working on this Start a discussion
Edit NOTES.md · Existing issues · Source on GitHub
Contributions
- October 20, 2026 · @teorth: Extended the remark with Tao's sketch and the variants by Barreto and Pescador. Drafted with Claude Code; sources and text checked by the contributor (PR #3).
- October 18, 2026 · @teorth: Added a remark pointing to the expositions and variants by Banks, Kerr and Green. Prepared with Claude Code (PR #2).
Abstract
We prove the uniform exclusion of Landau–Siegel zeros. There is an absolute constant c > 0 such that every real zero $\beta\in(0,1)$ of every primitive nonprincipal real Dirichlet L-function of conductor q ≥ 3 satisfies $(1-\beta)\log q\ge c$.
If the PDF does not display here, open it directly: Open PDF.
Notes
No other notes yet. Add a reference, a comment or your name with the buttons above, or edit NOTES.md on GitHub.
Automatically collected notes (unreviewed)
work in progress
Collected automatically by AI tools (Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra, 2026-10-23) and not checked by a person. May be wrong or incomplete. Report an error.
Follow-up works
- William D. Banks, On the OpenAI proof that Landau-Siegel zeros do not exist (arXiv:2610.15483, 2026-10-11). Gives a detailed direct proof of this paper's interpolation-determinant argument with explicit constants, $(1-\beta)\log q\ge 0.003$ for $q\ge10^{10}$, extended to all $q\ge3$ via Lu–Zaman–Zhao; cited in the paper's current version.
- Bryce Kerr, A simpler proof that there are no Landau--Siegel zeros (arXiv:2610.21099, 2026-10-15). Simplifies this paper's proof, replacing the interpolation lemma by a pigeonhole polynomial and Masser's zero estimate (as described in the paper's current version).
- Ben Green, On Landau–Siegel zeros (hexagon:2610.00311, v1 2026-10-17, v2 2026-10-18). Variant of this paper's argument working in Q(√d) with a Gram determinant and decoupled parameters improving its constant; provenance says the arguments are due to ChatGPT prompted by the author and the text is human-written. [AI-generated per source]
- Roelof van Dijk, A Frobenius determinant proof of the non-existence of Landau–Siegel zeros (hexagon:2610.00409, 2026-10-20). Variant following Kerr, Green and Barreto in which a Frobenius congruence gives both divisibility and nonvanishing of the determinant, avoiding resultants and Wronskians. [AI-generated per source]
Comments and discussion
- Ben Green, comment on Tao's blog (2026-10-19). Reports receiving a 4-page proof by Jacob Pescador and a 3-page proof by Kevin Barreto, and a planned communal write-up.
- Anurag Sahay, comment on Tao's blog (2026-10-19). Relates the adjoined √2 to the history of biquadratic-field arguments and asks whether other second discriminants give better bounds; Tao replies that only the degree matters, crediting A. Pascadi with the observation that more square roots bring the constant near 1/2.
- Kyle Pratt, comment on Tao's blog (2026-10-19). Compares the OpenAI/Kerr/Green arguments with Dobrowolski's method for Lehmer-type height lower bounds: a small auxiliary algebraic number divisible by many primes.
- Terence Tao, comment on his blog (2026-10-19). Describes the proof as a polynomial method closely tied to Stepanov's method, with Masser's 1981 lower bound on the "Zariski complexity" of grids used in Kerr's arrangement.
- Will Sawin, comment on Tao's blog (2026-10-20). Identifies the key lemma of the sketched argument as a discriminant-vanishing fact going back to Sylvester (1852), with a ramification analogue; Tao adds an analytic explanation.
- Terence Tao, An experimental AI math challenge: using tenth discriminant bounds to explore arguments ruling out Siegel zeroes (2026-10-20). Invites effective bounds for a tenth class-number-one discriminant from the new Siegel-zero and quasi-RH write-ups; several comments (e.g. twinheterodox) build on Banks's explicit version of this argument.
- Jared Duker Lichtman (@jdlichtman), post on X (2026-10-18). Compares Kerr's and Green's write-ups, noting Kerr devotes an extra page to deriving the no-Siegel-zeros statement from the bound on log(p)/p, which Green treats as the endpoint.
- Jared Duker Lichtman (@jdlichtman), post on X (2026-10-19). Links a write-up with the comment "No Siegel zeros proved in 3 pages".
- Thomas Bloom (@thomasfbloom), post on X (2026-10-19). Suggests the result came late partly because "few were trying", since Siegel zeros had "a near-mythical status" and other proofs were usually reduced to them.
- Shaowu Zhang (@ivanswzhang), post on X (2026-10-20). Opens a walk-through of this paper, calling it "a nice manuscript with genuinely new mathematical ideas and a good use of existing techniques."
- Luke Bailey (@LukeBailey181), post on X (2026-10-22). Shares a pseudo-formalization of the no-Siegel-zeros proof and says pseudo-formal proofs are easier to read and understand than the AI-written proofs.
Formalization
- OpenAI, The quasi-Riemann hypothesis: Lean scope note (openai/math release, 2026-10). The comparator statement SiegelZeros.lean formalizes 1−β ≥ c/log q for every primitive nonprincipal real character of conductor q ≥ 3 (both parities), with no explicit value of c.
Related prior literature mentioned by others
- Rick F. Lu, Asif Zaman and Haonan Zhao, Numerical Computations Concerning Landau-Siegel Zeros (arXiv:2602.03626, 2026-02-03). Verifies a logarithmic zero-free interval for quadratic Dirichlet L-functions with moduli up to $10^{10}$, supplying the finite-conductor input that Banks uses for his explicit version of this result.
- Terence Tao on Yitang Zhang's Siegel-zero preprints (2026-10-20). Hopes Zhang's two incomplete Siegel-zero preprints receive renewed attention in light of the new arguments.
Digests and expositions
- Terence Tao, A sketch of the proof of non-existence of Siegel zeroes (What's new, 2026-10-19). Expository sketch, in Green's formulation, of the argument derived from this paper (lattice covolume, archimedean and p-adic bounds), naming Masser's zero estimate, Laurent's interpolation determinants and Bombieri–Vaaler's Siegel lemma as classical tools; cited in the paper's current version. [family-level]
Elsewhere
- Hexagon: On Landau--Siegel zeros (human-written; human understanding: all)
- VibeMathed: Problem record
- whataifound: Registry entry
- Emergent Mind: family 003
Independent sites; their content is not reviewed here.
Cite
@misc{OAI:Uniform-exclusion-of-Landau-Siegel-zeros-October-1-2026,
author = {{OpenAI (with community contributions)}},
title = {{Uniform exclusion of Landau--Siegel zeros}},
howpublished = {OpenAI Math Release preprint
\href{https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/Uniform-exclusion-of-Landau-Siegel-zeros-October-1-2026/paper.pdf}{OAI:Uniform-exclusion-of-Landau-Siegel-zeros-October-1-2026}},
year = {2026}
}Lean formalization
OpenAI provides Lean files for this family: lean/docs/003.md. The Lean statements have not been checked by people against the paper's claims.
Family 003: The quasi-Riemann hypothesis
Proves that every Dirichlet L-function, including $\zeta(s)$, is zero-free in $\Re s\gt 7/8$, resolving the quasi-Riemann hypothesis. The same half-plane is zero-free for every finite-order Hecke L-function over $\mathbb Q(\sqrt{-3})$. A companion gives a different proof of the zero-free half-plane $\Re s\gt 11/12$.
Other papers in this family:
- The Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis: A Zero-Free Half-Plane $\Re s\gt 7/8$ · September 30, 2026
- The Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis (alternate 11/12 proof) · October 5, 2026