Browse › Theoretical computer science › 122 Quantitative trace-reconstruction bounds with a uniform decoder
Quantitative lower bounds for trace reconstruction
Open PDFCite Report a problem Add a reference or comment Interested in working on this Start a discussion
Edit NOTES.md · Existing issues · Source on GitHub
Abstract
Exact worst-case reconstruction of a binary word from independent deletion traces requires $n^{\Omega(\log\log n)}$ samples for every fixed deletion probability $q\in(0,1)$, even with unrestricted computation and any fixed positive success probability. This gives a negative answer to the polynomial-sample question for binary trace reconstruction. More generally, when $q^3\log n\to\infty$, we prove a lower bound of $n^{c\log(q^3\log n)}$ samples for every fixed $0\lt c\lt 1/(4\log2)$. Here q is the known deletion probability, and all logarithms are natural.
If the PDF does not display here, open it directly: Open PDF.
Notes
No notes yet. Add a reference, a comment or your name with the buttons above, or edit NOTES.md on GitHub.
Automatically collected notes (unreviewed)
work in progress
Collected automatically by AI tools (Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra, 2026-10-21) and not checked by a person. May be wrong or incomplete. Report an error.
Comments and discussion
- AIM open-problem collection (MColbrook/AIM), Problem 321: Polynomial sample complexity for deletion-trace reconstruction (AIM entry, last checked 2026-10-13). Marks the polynomial-sample question as solved by counterexample, citing this paper's Theorems 1.1 and 1.2; the entry calls itself "an AI statement-level review of a published manuscript, not a fresh independent audit." [AI-generated per source]
- AIM, OpenAI manuscript cross-reference, 13 October 2026 (AIM solution review, 2026-10-13). Compares this paper's definitions (complete traces, a common randomized decoder, s=2/3) with AIM problem 321 and notes "No successful local replay/axiom log" for the Lean module. [AI-generated per source]
Formalization
- OpenAI math release / mathcommunity mirror, Lean scope note 122: Quantitative trace-reconstruction bounds with a uniform decoder (lean/docs/122.md, 2026-10-06). Links the comparator statement and describes the Lean formalization of this paper's bound $T_{q,s}(n)\ge n^{c\log(q^3\log n)}$, superpolynomial sample complexity at every fixed deletion probability, and the superpolynomial decay of the minimum one-trace total variation.
- OpenAI, TraceReconstruction.lean (openai/math, commit adc7f12). The Lean module stating
quantitative_sample_lower_bound,superpolynomial_one_traceandsuperpolynomial_sample_complexity, which correspond to Theorems 1.1 and 1.2.
Related prior literature mentioned by others
- Arnav Burudgunte, Paul Valiant and Hongao Wang, Quasipolynomial Trace Reconstruction (arXiv:2607.04073v1, 2026-07-05). The AI Proved What? exposition identifies this earlier quasipolynomial sample upper bound as background to the family’s lower-bound and decoder claims. [family-level]
- Zachary Chase, New Lower Bounds for Trace Reconstruction (arXiv:1905.03031v2, 2020-07-23). The AI Proved What? exposition compares the claimed superpolynomial lower bound with Chase’s earlier $\Omega(n^{3/2}/\log^7 n)$ lower bound.
Possibly relevant literature (found by the agent, not checked)
- Burudgunte, Valiant, Wang, New Bounds for Circular Trace Reconstruction (ITCS 2026, LIPIcs, doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.30; arXiv:2512.02412). Proves an $\tilde\Omega(n^5)$ lower bound for the circular variant using pairs of constant-sparse strings with nearly indistinguishable traces, a related lower-bound construction not cited in the paper's history section.
Digests and expositions
- AI Proved What?, Polynomially many traces? Lower and upper bounds for trace reconstruction (Episode 122, October 2026). This video and transcript explain the three papers’ claims, the multiscale lower-bound construction and moment-based decoder, and distinguish the lower-bound Lean scope from the upper bounds. [AI-generated per source] [family-level]
Elsewhere
- VibeMathed: Problem record
- Emergent Mind: family 122
Independent sites; their content is not reviewed here.
Cite
@misc{OAI:quantitative-lower-bounds-for-trace-reconstruction-September-24-2026,
author = {{OpenAI}},
title = {{Quantitative lower bounds for trace reconstruction}},
howpublished = {OpenAI Math Release preprint
\href{https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/quantitative-lower-bounds-for-trace-reconstruction-September-24-2026/paper.pdf}{OAI:quantitative-lower-bounds-for-trace-reconstruction-September-24-2026}},
year = {2026}
}Lean formalization
OpenAI provides Lean files for this family: lean/docs/122.md. The Lean statements have not been checked by people against the paper's claims.
Family 122: Quantitative trace-reconstruction bounds with a uniform decoder
At every fixed deletion probability in $(0,1)$, reconstructing an arbitrary length-n binary string requires $n^{\Omega(\log\log n)}$ independent traces, ruling out polynomial-sample reconstruction. A uniform decoder achieves quasipolynomial sample and running-time bounds for known fixed rational retention probabilities. When the deletion probability is at most $n^{-\varepsilon}$ for fixed ε > 0, both bounds become polynomial in the input and parameter encoding.
Other papers in this family:
- Uniform quasipolynomial-time trace reconstruction · October 5, 2026
- A latest-anchor induction with spectrally compact masks for worst-case trace reconstruction · October 5, 2026