Browse › Theoretical computer science › 122 Quantitative trace-reconstruction bounds with a uniform decoder
Uniform quasipolynomial-time trace reconstruction
Open PDFCite Report a problem Add a reference or comment Interested in working on this Start a discussion
Edit NOTES.md · Existing issues · Source on GitHub
Abstract
We give a uniform algorithm that reconstructs every binary string from independent deletion traces when its length and rational retention probability are known. For each fixed retention probability, both the number of traces and the bit complexity are quasipolynomial in the string length. More generally, we give an explicit sample bound uniform over all rational retention probabilities, with running time polynomial in the sample budget and the binary input length. If the deletion probability is at most $n^{-\varepsilon}$ for fixed ε > 0, the sample and running-time bounds are polynomial. Reconstruction succeeds with probability at least 2/3 for each input string.
If the PDF does not display here, open it directly: Open PDF.
Notes
No notes yet. Add a reference, a comment or your name with the buttons above, or edit NOTES.md on GitHub.
Automatically collected notes (unreviewed)
work in progress
Collected automatically by AI tools (Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra, 2026-10-21) and not checked by a person. May be wrong or incomplete. Report an error.
Formalization
- OpenAI math release / mathcommunity mirror, Lean scope note 122: Quantitative trace-reconstruction bounds with a uniform decoder (lean/docs/122.md, 2026-10-06). The family's Lean scope note lists only the companion lower-bound paper, so it does not cover this paper's decoder or its upper bounds. [family-level]
Related prior literature mentioned by others
- Arnav Burudgunte, Paul Valiant and Hongao Wang, Quasipolynomial Trace Reconstruction (arXiv:2607.04073v1, 2026-07-05). The AI Proved What? exposition identifies this earlier quasipolynomial sample upper bound as background to the family’s lower-bound and decoder claims. [family-level]
Digests and expositions
- AI Proved What?, Polynomially many traces? Lower and upper bounds for trace reconstruction (Episode 122, October 2026). This video and transcript explain the three papers’ claims, the multiscale lower-bound construction and moment-based decoder, and distinguish the lower-bound Lean scope from the upper bounds. [AI-generated per source] [family-level]
Elsewhere
- Emergent Mind: family 122
Independent sites; their content is not reviewed here.
Cite
@misc{OAI:Uniform-quasipolynomial-time-trace-reconstruction-October-5-2026,
author = {{OpenAI}},
title = {{Uniform quasipolynomial-time trace reconstruction}},
howpublished = {OpenAI Math Release preprint
\href{https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/Uniform-quasipolynomial-time-trace-reconstruction-October-5-2026/uniform-trace-reconstruction.pdf}{OAI:Uniform-quasipolynomial-time-trace-reconstruction-October-5-2026}},
year = {2026}
}Lean formalization
OpenAI provides Lean files for this family: lean/docs/122.md. The Lean statements have not been checked by people against the paper's claims.
Family 122: Quantitative trace-reconstruction bounds with a uniform decoder
At every fixed deletion probability in $(0,1)$, reconstructing an arbitrary length-n binary string requires $n^{\Omega(\log\log n)}$ independent traces, ruling out polynomial-sample reconstruction. A uniform decoder achieves quasipolynomial sample and running-time bounds for known fixed rational retention probabilities. When the deletion probability is at most $n^{-\varepsilon}$ for fixed ε > 0, both bounds become polynomial in the input and parameter encoding.
Other papers in this family:
- A latest-anchor induction with spectrally compact masks for worst-case trace reconstruction · October 5, 2026
- Quantitative lower bounds for trace reconstruction · September 24, 2026