oai-math-revised beta

Browse › Convex and metric geometry › 088 Sharp projection-body inequalities and a counterexample to simplex maximization

A product counterexample to the simplex maximum for projection-body volume

OpenAI · September 24, 2026

Lean

Open PDFCite Report a problem Add a reference or comment Interested in working on this Start a discussion

Edit NOTES.md · Existing issues · Source on GitHub

Abstract

The product of two ten-dimensional simplices has larger normalized projection-body volume than a twenty-dimensional simplex. This gives a counterexample to Brannen's proposed simplex maximum.

If the PDF does not display here, open it directly: Open PDF.

Notes

No notes yet. Add a reference, a comment or your name with the buttons above, or edit NOTES.md on GitHub.

Automatically collected notes (unreviewed)

work in progress

Collected automatically by AI tools (Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra, 2026-10-21) and not checked by a person. May be wrong or incomplete. Report an error.

Formalization

  • OpenAI math release, Lean scope notes for family 088 (lean/docs/088.md, release of 2026-10-06). States that the formalized counterexample is T₁₀ × T₁₀ with ratio 22,355,476/22,020,096 > 1 (comparator statements ProjectionCounterexample.lean and ProjectionVolume.lean); the exponential-excess result for large dimensions is not included. [family-level]
  • anxkhn, Add the exact product counterexample to Brannen's simplex maximum (google-deepmind/formal-conjectures issue #7146, opened 2026-10-11, open). Proposes adding the explicit dimension-20 witness and exact ratio from Theorem 1 of this paper, without the exponential consequence.
  • anxkhn, feat(Paper): add Brannen's product counterexample (google-deepmind/formal-conjectures PR #7151, opened 2026-10-11, open, one approving review 2026-10-12). Only the rational comparison is proved there; the geometric identity for the projection-body volume is left as a sorry, with no formal_proof attribute.

Possibly relevant literature (found by the agent, not checked)

Digests and expositions

News and blogs

Elsewhere

Independent sites; their content is not reviewed here.

Cite

@misc{OAI:A-product-counterexample-to-the-simplex-maximum-for-projection-body-volume-September-24-2026,
  author = {{OpenAI}},
  title = {{A product counterexample to the simplex maximum for projection-body volume}},
  howpublished = {OpenAI Math Release preprint
                  \href{https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/A-product-counterexample-to-the-simplex-maximum-for-projection-body-volume-September-24-2026/paper.pdf}{OAI:A-product-counterexample-to-the-simplex-maximum-for-projection-body-volume-September-24-2026}},
  year = {2026}
}

Lean formalization

OpenAI provides Lean files for this family: lean/docs/088.md. The Lean statements have not been checked by people against the paper's claims.

Family 088: Sharp projection-body inequalities and a counterexample to simplex maximization

Proves Petty's projection-volume conjecture in the remaining dimensions n ≥ 4: ellipsoids uniquely minimize projection-body volume at fixed body volume. Also establishes the full Lutwak–Petty projection inequalities. In contrast, products of simplices exceed Brannen's proposed simplex maximum for normalized projection-body volume by an exponential factor in every sufficiently large dimension.

Other papers in this family: