oai-math-revised beta

Browse › Mathematical physics › 270 Threshold and positive-energy bound states of the BFSS matrix model

The unique threshold bound state of the SU(N) BFSS model

OpenAI · September 24, 2026

Open PDFCite Report a problem Add a reference or comment Interested in working on this Start a discussion

Edit NOTES.md · Existing issues · Source on GitHub

Abstract

For every finite N ≥ 2, we prove that undeformed $\mathop{\mathrm{SU}}\nolimits (N)$ BFSS matrix quantum mechanics has exactly one normalizable zero-energy state after removing the center of mass. This establishes the threshold-bound-state conjecture.

If the PDF does not display here, open it directly: Open PDF.

Notes

No notes yet. Add a reference, a comment or your name with the buttons above, or edit NOTES.md on GitHub.

Automatically collected notes (unreviewed)

work in progress

Collected automatically by AI tools (Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra, 2026-10-21) and not checked by a person. May be wrong or incomplete. Report an error.

Possibly relevant literature (found by the agent, not checked)

Elsewhere

Independent sites; their content is not reviewed here.

Cite

@misc{OAI:The-unique-threshold-bound-state-of-the-SU-N-BFSS-model-September-24-2026,
  author = {{OpenAI}},
  title = {{The unique threshold bound state of the $\mathrm{SU}(N)$ BFSS model}},
  howpublished = {OpenAI Math Release preprint
                  \href{https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/The-unique-threshold-bound-state-of-the-SU-N-BFSS-model-September-24-2026/paper.pdf}{OAI:The-unique-threshold-bound-state-of-the-SU-N-BFSS-model-September-24-2026}},
  year = {2026}
}

Family 270: Threshold and positive-energy bound states of the BFSS matrix model

Proves that the undeformed relative $\mathrm{SU}(N)$ BFSS model has exactly one normalizable zero-energy state for every finite N ≥ 2, resolving the threshold-bound-state conjecture. For $\mathrm{SU}(2)$, a companion proves infinitely many normalizable positive-energy eigenstates with unbounded energies, contradicting the original BFSS paper's exclusion of additional bound states at N = 2.

Other papers in this family: