oai-math-revised beta

Browse › Number theory › 009 Function-field reconstruction from Milnor K-theory and Galois data

The Bogomolov-Pop reconstruction theorem

OpenAI · September 23, 2026

Lean

Open PDFCite Report a problem Add a reference or comment Interested in working on this Start a discussion

Edit NOTES.md · Existing issues · Source on GitHub

Abstract

We prove the Bogomolov–Pop reconstruction conjecture for function fields of transcendence degree at least two over arbitrary algebraically closed fields of characteristic different from ℓ. The pro-ℓ abelian-by-central datum determines the perfect closure and its constant field, with precisely the Frobenius and ℓ-adic unit ambiguities.

If the PDF does not display here, open it directly: Open PDF.

Notes

No notes yet. Add a reference, a comment or your name with the buttons above, or edit NOTES.md on GitHub.

Automatically collected notes (unreviewed)

work in progress

Collected automatically by AI tools (Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra, 2026-10-21) and not checked by a person. May be wrong or incomplete. Report an error.

Comments and discussion

Formalization

  • OpenAI, Function-field reconstruction from Milnor K-theory and Galois data: Lean scope note (OpenAI math release, lean/docs/009.md, October 6, 2026). Describes a Lean formalization of injectivity of the reconstruction map in Theorem 1.1 (field isomorphisms inducing the same Galois isomorphism up to ℓ-adic units agree modulo Frobenius); it states that existence (surjectivity) is outside its scope.
  • OpenAI math release, Injectivity.lean (openai/math, lean/OAI/Algebra/BogomolovPop, 2026). Lean source proving main_canonical_injective (injectivity of the canonical map) and the corollary main_graph_injective; it covers only the injectivity half of Theorem 1.1. [AI-generated per source]

Possibly relevant literature (found by the agent, not checked)

Digests and expositions

  • AI Proved What?, The whole field from a shadow (Episode 009, October 2026). This AI-assisted video and transcript explain the three reconstruction claims, outline the mod-ℓ argument, and distinguish the Galois uniqueness formalization from the full theorem. [AI-generated per source] [family-level]

Elsewhere

Independent sites; their content is not reviewed here.

Cite

@misc{OAI:The-Bogomolov-Pop-reconstruction-theorem-September-23-2026,
  author = {{OpenAI}},
  title = {{The Bogomolov--Pop reconstruction theorem}},
  howpublished = {OpenAI Math Release preprint
                  \href{https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/The-Bogomolov-Pop-reconstruction-theorem-September-23-2026/paper.pdf}{OAI:The-Bogomolov-Pop-reconstruction-theorem-September-23-2026}},
  year = {2026}
}

Lean formalization

OpenAI provides Lean files for this family: lean/docs/009.md. The Lean statements have not been checked by people against the paper's claims.

Family 009: Function-field reconstruction from Milnor K-theory and Galois data

Reconstructs function fields of transcendence degree at least two over algebraically closed constants from $K^{\mathrm M}_1/\ell$, $K^{\mathrm M}_2/\ell$, and their product. These data recover the perfect closure and constants when ℓ differs from the characteristic, and the original field and its named base in equal characteristic. Also proves Bogomolov–Pop reconstruction from abelian-by-central pro-ℓ Galois data away from the characteristic.

Other papers in this family: