oai-math-revised beta

Browse › Combinatorics › 162 Counterexamples to Ryser’s covering conjecture

A counterexample to Ryser's covering conjecture

OpenAI · September 23, 2026

Lean

Open PDFCite Report a problem Add a reference or comment Interested in working on this Start a discussion

Edit NOTES.md · Existing issues · Source on GitHub

Abstract

For every sufficiently large prime $s\equiv2\pmod3$ and every sufficiently large odd integer n, with the threshold depending on s, we construct an intersecting $(s^n+1)$-partite $(s^n+1)$-uniform hypergraph with covering number $s^n+1$. This disproves Ryser's covering conjecture in its intersecting case.

If the PDF does not display here, open it directly: Open PDF.

Notes

No notes yet. Add a reference, a comment or your name with the buttons above, or edit NOTES.md on GitHub.

Automatically collected notes (unreviewed)

work in progress

Collected automatically by AI tools (Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra, 2026-10-21) and not checked by a person. May be wrong or incomplete. Report an error.

Formalization

Possibly relevant literature (found by the agent, not checked)

Digests and expositions

News and blogs

Elsewhere

Independent sites; their content is not reviewed here.

Cite

@misc{OAI:A-Counterexample-to-Rysers-Covering-Conjecture-September-23-2026,
  author = {{OpenAI}},
  title = {{A counterexample to Ryser's covering conjecture}},
  howpublished = {OpenAI Math Release preprint
                  \href{https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/A-Counterexample-to-Rysers-Covering-Conjecture-September-23-2026/paper.pdf}{OAI:A-Counterexample-to-Rysers-Covering-Conjecture-September-23-2026}},
  year = {2026}
}

Lean formalization

OpenAI provides Lean files for this family: lean/docs/162.md. The Lean statements have not been checked by people against the paper's claims.

Family 162: Counterexamples to Ryser’s covering conjecture

Disproves Ryser's covering conjecture by constructing intersecting $(q+1)$-partite, $(q+1)$-uniform hypergraphs with covering number $q+1$, rather than the predicted bound q, for every sufficiently large prime q. A separate construction over extension fields also disproves Gyárfás's monochromatic tree-cover conjecture.

Other papers in this family: